Eye Floater Removal Removal Of Floater In Eyes?

embracing the premise

Last night was raised a little discussion on freedom of the players in RPGs.
E 'because the common thought that a character in an RPG should have the freedom to act in the manner they prefer. I want to bring a message that I read in the forum for people who play , while "studying" for My Life with Master. The author is

Korin Duval

One of the hardest things to see in an RPG is one of the easiest things to see in a game (GDT from here on), and speak of what we call "Embracing the Foreword. "

[...]

I mean
playing a board game like, say, of Thrones, you put the table and is embraced (or accept) the premise of saying "ok, everyone has a family that hates the other and wants to conquer more land as possible. " Ditto the premise Genocide (!) Of Risk, or the ruthless capitalist Monopoly / Monopoly (and an economist, a game in which the monopoly is the ultimate goal coveted makes me wake up at night screaming in horror: P), or in Arkham Horror, which controlled the characters are motivated enough to risk his skin to save the city and then the whole world .

in RPGs is more difficult to see that acceptance of the premise.
I do not know whether to blame the usual, very bad idea that "an RPG should let you do everything" (as in: any type of PG and all kinds of history, just as it is) or the usual habit of not trusting the regulations , by dint of blows taken by them in the teeth.

But the regulations that work can only work if one accepts the premise of the game and want to to fulfill.
In Dogs in the Vineyard must be motivated to pretend that the non-player characters are people under its responsibility just as much as in D & D or Storming must assume that the PCs are heroes who go to fight monsters.

a good game will make it easier to accept the premise and understanding, Adventure in prime time, for example, built part of the Preface to the players themselves (the fixed part is "is a TV series)! Other games require the players a longer initial step because they show something more "exotic": CNV, LMVcP .[...] [...] also

My Life with Master is a game that, without taking the prerequisites for good, shrivels and falls apart on itself, as much as, say, a game of chess where a player plays "as much to do" or move the pieces at random or "play to lose."
who is not motivated to do a horrific journey into a world of cruelty, catharsis, and (perhaps) redemption, not games, because you amuse him and undermine the enjoyment of others. Those who have liver, face down. ^ __-

, citing the discussion, which had as its main argument Vampire the Masquerade, if you do not accept that the vampire is primarily a solitary being, not unaccustomed to join in with a coterie of other vampires bloodlines, without some form constriction or a strong motivation that often it is highly unlikely to find, but you try to embrace the belief that you can group to address common dangers, without any plausible justification (as in D & D), then the game will be boring. After all, the fun of Vampire the Masquerade, it should not be using this or that power, but in interpreting a tragic figure and immortal, which continued as the enemy himself (the Beast and the violation of laws the Masquerade), and those around him (other vampires with the desire to have a rival less).